Re: Last Person To Post Here Wins!
Posted: April 4th, 2020, 2:24 pm
@pinkteddyx64 what do you think abt this emote on tsr? :E can't find it here..
Oh no we are not!
http://www.thebritsareajoke.com/
unturned_cake wrote:@pinkteddyx64 what do you think abt this emote on tsr? :E can't find it here..
pinkteddyx64 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:@pinkteddyx64 what do you think abt this emote on tsr? :E can't find it here..
I like it. I can add it if you want.
unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
On that basis, shall we start a new version of this at 50k?spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
pinkteddyx64 wrote:On that basis, shall we start a new version of this at 50k?spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
Possibly endless
spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
Possibly endless
Well, here's another to add to the tally
Also I'm not just looking at printers now, I'm also looking at old Sky or Virgin Media boxes too, because they have hard drives in them which can be salvaged for use in a PC
unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
Possibly endless
Well, here's another to add to the tally
Also I'm not just looking at printers now, I'm also looking at old Sky or Virgin Media boxes too, because they have hard drives in them which can be salvaged for use in a PC
yeah
Ooh that's nice..wait whats Sky/ Virgin Media boxes?
unturned_cake wrote:Mice & men...
spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
Possibly endless
Well, here's another to add to the tally
Also I'm not just looking at printers now, I'm also looking at old Sky or Virgin Media boxes too, because they have hard drives in them which can be salvaged for use in a PC
yeah
Ooh that's nice..wait whats Sky/ Virgin Media boxes?
Indeed
Sky is a TV system used in the UK that uses satellite signals, whereas Virgin Media is the UK's cable TV provider.
Both companies allow you to record live TV and watch it at a later date - so will contain a hard drive of some sort.
If I can get the recording boxes cheap enough, I can take the hard drives out and have a cheap way of storing more data for a PC etc.
You can never have too many computer hard drives - e.g. for backing up, additional storage space, transferring large amounts of data between PCs, etc etc.
spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Mice & men...
Of Mice and Men?
I still have my copy of that book, you know! We did that back in 2010/2011 as part of my GCSE English
pinkteddyx64 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:@pinkteddyx64 what do you think abt this emote on tsr? :E can't find it here..
I like it. I can add it if you want.
unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:spotify95 wrote:unturned_cake wrote:Will it end at pg 500?
It'll end whenever we want it to end, if it's anything like CTAM then it'll get so big that it'll crash the website
I still have no faith whatsoever in PT completing CTAM in one part... when I last checked, there were over 200k posts left to go, and the website has been struggling (due to the size of the thread) ever since it got to about 500k. Why couldn't he split it into four 250k parts?!
I know what I'd do if I was the site owner... I'd do something sensible (not like TSR where a new part is required every 10k posts), but not put the entire site at risk due to a couple of large threads crashing it. Maybe 20 x 50k threads, or 10 x 100k threads would be the ideal balance between performance and visibility / convenience.
Whenever!
Given that we're currently at approx. 2500 posts on this thread, we've got a long way to go before we even need to think about splitting this into different parts
Possibly endless
Well, here's another to add to the tally
Also I'm not just looking at printers now, I'm also looking at old Sky or Virgin Media boxes too, because they have hard drives in them which can be salvaged for use in a PC
yeah
Ooh that's nice..wait whats Sky/ Virgin Media boxes?
Indeed
Sky is a TV system used in the UK that uses satellite signals, whereas Virgin Media is the UK's cable TV provider.
Both companies allow you to record live TV and watch it at a later date - so will contain a hard drive of some sort.
If I can get the recording boxes cheap enough, I can take the hard drives out and have a cheap way of storing more data for a PC etc.
You can never have too many computer hard drives - e.g. for backing up, additional storage space, transferring large amounts of data between PCs, etc etc.
Oooh I see.. recording it is really cool feature imo (ah yes i remember the video linked on
TSR )
Out of the box thought aye a bonafide win-win (profit + lowering digital waste)