Count to a MINUS million and be the first forum to do it!

[pinkteddyx64]

-2501.

[Zak]

-2502.

[Zak]

-2503.

[Zak]

-2504.

[Zak]

-2505.

[Zak]

-2506.

[Zak]

-2507.

[Zak]

-2508.

[Zak]

-2509.

[Zak]

-2510.

[Zak]

-2511.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2512.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2513.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2514.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2515.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2516.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2517.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2518.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2519.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2520.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2521.

[spotify95]

@princechromey CTAMM on DS started after the delete all posts shenanigans ended.

Plus on TSR, when an impostor of andy98 posted in CTAMM, two of their numbers were binned even though the posts contained the correct numbers, hence why I referred to the TSR CTAMM as being screwed up.

Although I'm very impressed at how fast it is currently going! (Will soon be on part 3!) Let's see if we can get CTAM by fives to a similar pace!

On a final note, can we see how far we can sneak both CTAMM and CTAM in 5s past 10000 posts? I don't mean just ten or twenty posts past, I mean like 250 posts past like we did with a CTAM part last summer.

That'd mean not setting up new thread parts in advance, and leaving it to the ST to close the thread when they notice it has exceeded 10000 posts and start a new one, like when Stiff Little Fingers did that with CTAMM for you.

If on the other hand both are closed at exactly 10000 posts, can I throw bricks at Leicester's House Of Fraser store?

-2472.

I know all about the TSR one, and believe me, I fought as hard as I could to get them back, but the CT was ignoring me, and I wasn't ST! Hopefully one day I will be ST though.

I managed to get GvB just over 10k last time, I was thinking of pushing it to about 10.5k , but remember, I always have to get a post in at the end of each thread, stating the continuation of the next part. If a mod locks it before I can do that, there will be issues...

I'm going to try and push CTAM/CTAMM etc as far as I can... hopefully 10.5k or 11k, but even a couple of hundred more would help - as a couple of hundred more each time could result in one less thread being required (overall).

SLF closed the first CTAMM at 10,040 posts - which might as well have been 10k...

-2522

[pinkteddyx64]

-2523.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2524.

[pinkteddyx64]

-2525.